6 ms·
Hahaha, wow. The other products on that page do a wonderful job of disagreeing with parent’s explanation.
by reportingsjr 2y ago
Hahaha, wow. The other products on that page do a wonderful job of disagreeing with parent’s explanation.
- stavros 2y agoThere's a "one eyed snake" product too, why are we not complaining about how men will be driven from the profession with such sexist talk?
- maxerickson 2y agoSexualizing the product name at all is more hostile to women than the reference is hostile to men.
- worthless-trash 2y agoAre you suggesting women are less able to take hostilities than men ? Since now we have inuendos from both.
- esperent 2y agoContext matters. In a 95% male profession, making hostile comments about women is absolutely more of an issue than similar comments about men. And vice versa in a predominantly female profession.
- maxerickson 2y agoI'm suggesting that the "inuendos from both" is the wrong analysis and that the workplace issue would be the sexualization of the product name being used as a tool to harass women (there would probably also be comments made to men, but harassment would predominantly be towards women).
- conscion 2y agoHostilities from men towards women are much more dangerous and women have the correct response to be more vigilant about them.
- DrPimienta 2y agoThen why are men and women treated equally at all?
- worthless-trash 2y agoThis is the right question