5 ms·

It might be a mistake since it's different from what's stated in their readme: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/llama3_2/USE_POLICY.

It might be a mistake since it's different from what's stated in their readme: https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/llama3_2/USE_POLICY.md https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/... (which is referring to the license of Meta Llama 3.2)

notpushkin 2y ago
Oh, I see the links now, thanks! But they reference four different licenses, and those are the licenses just for model weights I think? If the intention was to make something that you can only use with Llama models, stating that clearly in a separate code license file would be better IMO. (Of course, this would also mean that the code still isn’t open source.)