6 ms·
I understand the happy case. When it works, great. My critiques were on the sad cases: * Presses <Ctrl><Ctrl><Ctrl>. Wait why isnt this working? Too late. *
by froggerexpert 2y ago
I understand the happy case. When it works, great.
My critiques were on the sad cases:
* Presses <Ctrl><Ctrl><Ctrl>. Wait why isnt this working? Too late.
* Presses <Shift><Shift><Shift> on another sensitive site that doesn't implement this. Too late.
* Presses <Shift><Shift><Shift> on a poorly supported browser, or after the functionality is removed, or after it conflicts with OS-level (it might not today, but who knows about future OS updates)
- PaulRobinson 2y agoWe should probably bake it into browser standards then.
- oneeyedpigeon 2y agoAbsolutely. This would solve the above problems, plus any problems involving JavaScript bugs that would render the whole thing inactive. Just a shortcut to go to the root of the site seems appropriate. Or maybe sites could configure themselves for a "safe site" equivalent if their whole content is a risk.