"Principles" as in arbitrary precedents set by bribed politically-motivated lawmakers and judges. No, people are correctly pointing out the fact that this is b

"Principles" as in arbitrary precedents set by bribed politically-motivated lawmakers and judges. No, people are correctly pointing out the fact that this is blatantly unfair. You are claiming that 2+2=5 because a judge said so. If you are concerned about the "consequences" maybe you should start thinking about how open platforms are now legally disadvantaged to closed platforms.