6 ms·
If you assume that the costs of inference would continue to decrease while they would be able to get billion people hooked on 42 per dollar plan.. That’s $0.5
by kwikiel 2y ago
If you assume that the costs of inference would continue to decrease while they would be able to get billion people hooked on 42 per dollar plan..
That’s $0.5 trillion revenue rate
- patrickmcnamara 2y agoOh, just a billion? Why not 100 billion while we're at it?
- moralestapia 2y agoBecause there's only 6-7Bn people in the planet? Come on, man.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- blitzar 2y agoYou are not thinking intergallactially.
- lewhoo 2y agoWith 3.6B people in the workforce I'd argue there isn't a billion people in need of a computer, not to mention an ai subscription plan. I'm of course assuming most subscriptions for ai are work related.
- zwnow 2y agoI use free AI tools and will never pay for it. There are many people like this.
- r2_pilot 2y agoAdditionally, I pay for Anthropic's products and will not consider OpenAI offerings. There are many people like this.
- PhilipRoman 2y agoIndeed, there is a massive gap between free and $1/month. Personally I outright refuse to buy anything digital involving monthly payments (except where there is no alternative like domain names, etc.)
- seper8 2y agoI pay more for a faster PC and a bigger screen. I also pay for better AI. My - and probably your time - and the time saved by using superior tooling, is worth far more than the meagre few dollars spent each month on some subscription. You're stepping over dollars to pick up dimes.
- zwnow 2y agoAI tooling that costs money does not provide anything better than the freely available tools. If you built some product upon it, I'm sorry but your product is not worth a dime.