7 ms·
>uBOL is not an important extension on Firefox. Perhaps you should read some earlier comments then you wouldn't say such things? Hints: Firefox mobile; range
by witrak 2y ago
>uBOL is not an important extension on Firefox.
Perhaps you should read some earlier comments then you wouldn't say such things?
Hints: Firefox mobile; range of privileges required.
- jorams 2y agoI did, it does not change what I said. uBO works perfectly fine on Firefox Mobile and doesn't use much battery. People can prefer uBOL, but that doesn't make it important to the ecosystem.
- mossTechnician 2y agoOut of all the criticism Firefox fans make of the mobile version, excess CPU usage and excess RAM usage are at the top of the list. Maybe high-end phones run Firefox decently now, but not everybody has a high-end phone. If uBOL has a place on Firefox, mobile Firefox is where it's best.