8 ms·
> In fact, they'd likely pay more because then they could reduce investment in detecting bots. A lot more. Preventing bots from eating up your entire digital a
by Veuxdo 2y ago
> In fact, they'd likely pay more because then they could reduce investment in detecting bots.
A lot more. Preventing bots from eating up your entire digital advertising budget takes a lot of time and money.
- speed_spread 2y agoMaking advertising more efficient would also open up opportunities for smaller players. Right now only the big guys have the chops to carpet-bomb the market regardless of bots. Noise benefits those who can afford to stand above it.
- jumping_frog 2y agoPay per impression is a metric adexchanges use. So it is not in best interest of companies to remove bots. Bots create "economic activity" when such metrics are used.