10 ms·
> a "low-overhead" parallelization library Who is out here building high-overhead parallelization libraries?
by zbowling 2y ago
> a "low-overhead" parallelization library
Who is out here building high-overhead parallelization libraries?
- zamalek 2y agoI have almost certainly built high overhead parallelization primitives during my junior years.
- internetter 2y agoRelatively, Rayon is higher overhead
- andrepd 2y agoYeah, why are those bastards writing slow code? They should just write fast code instead
- therein 2y agoYeah and people should make sure not to commit bugs too. I look at all these commits with bugs and I'm like why are you committing bugs.
- bravetraveler 2y agoStop publishing software, you don't refine your meal constantly! Enough is enough!
- bionsystem 2y agoIn the early 2000s we were still in high school and a friend of mine told me that it's pointless to chose a carrier in SWE because eventually all the software will be written and there would be nothing to do. Well we both ended up in CS but it's really a funny take nowadays (by then I wasn't so sure and it made me worry a bit).
- tonyhart7 2y agowe got paid to fix someone else code, whoever invented wordpress has made a million jobs
- silon42 2y agoFast code is often unmaintainable, that's why new high-speed libraries keep popping up.
- bravetraveler 2y agoCheck out my high-overhead replacement for 'cat' in BASH ~ $ type cat cat is a function cat () { while read; do printf '%s\n' "$REPLY"; done < "$@" } It probably butchers things. Why? I got bored in a meeting and someone accidentally posted 'cat' to Teams