6 ms·
Lots of small strings sparsely spread over 282MB is pretty cache inefficient? Whereas the separate small allocations will likely end up close together, which g
by ctz 2y ago
Lots of small strings sparsely spread over 282MB is pretty cache inefficient?
Whereas the separate small allocations will likely end up close together, which gives a better chance that a given cache line will contain several rather than just one.