http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anarchist_communities http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anarchist_communities http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_in

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anarchist_communities http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anarchist_communities http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_in_Africa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_in_Africa >One can say that's not what this discussion is about, i.e. it's the potential for equality, the right to be equal rather than the radical definition above, but then the discussion becomes muddled, how to measure inequality, economically (e.g. the Gini index), by asking people, etc. "Inequality" then becomes a very complicated word like "democracy" or "justice". Personally, I think that it's very simple to define. We know from research that having more money, past the point of no longer being in poverty, does nothing significant to increase happiness. So, in my opinion, equality, in terms of money, is about nobody having to live in poverty and discomfort. The democracy we are used to is Representative Democracy. When a few people hold all of the power, and we just get to vote for our dictators, what kind of democracy is that!? Personally, I think that Direct Democracy deserves more attention and experimentation. Some countries have been running it for years and their quality of life is among the best in the world.