5 ms·

He was freed in 2020: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/02/man-who-refused-to-decrypt-hard-drives-is-free-after-four-years-in-jail/ https://arstechnica.c

• fl0id 2y ago
  There’s a comment on that later article that surely he would be charged for real on the existing evidence. But at least google turned up nothing.
• xtiansimon 2y ago
  “Of course, the contents of the hard drive might incriminate Rawls, but the contents of the hard drive are not considered testimony for Fifth Amendment purposes.” Huh