So at this point are you admitting fully that you have no evidence for your claim? Your entire bet is conjecture? > That does not mean the hypothesis is true,

So at this point are you admitting fully that you have no evidence for your claim? Your entire bet is conjecture? > That does not mean the hypothesis is true, it only means you haven't falsified it. Correct. You can't prove a negative, you've only just figured this out? After I listed TWO simple examples that could be found in an introductory philosophy class?! In the Wikipedia article consisting of a couple of paragraphs I linked you? PLEASE JUST READ. PLEASE JUST READ. PLEASE JUST READ. PLEASE JUST READ. You can't prove negative statements. I want you to admit this so I know you understand, now repeat after me: "You can't prove negative statements." I know this is likely wasted on you, but here goes: You can't prove the hypothesis: "There does not exist an unobservable teapot in the orbit of Jupiter." For the SAME reason I can't prove the hypothesis: "LLMs can never eventually be used for generating good incident reports." For the SAME reason I can't prove the hypothesis: "God doesn't exist." For the SAME reason I can't prove the hypothesis: "A unicorn does not exist at the center of the Earth." I fully admit this in the comment you've supposedly read. This is why the burden of proof lies on the person making the positive claim (this is you).