7 ms·
Nah, that assumes everyone was paying attention and was perfectly coordinated in a stupid pointless effort that was bound to fail. It's a lot easier to believe
by uses 2y ago
Nah, that assumes everyone was paying attention and was perfectly coordinated in a stupid pointless effort that was bound to fail.
It's a lot easier to believe the official explanation. Which is that someone typed in a prompt like "what are some quotes from famous movie reviewers that were negative about francis ford coppola's films?" and just copy-pasted the output without understanding that LLMs can make things up. And everyone who should've caught it was lazy or just simply didn't second guess the work that was done fifteen steps prior in the pipeline.
- nerdponx 2y agoWhen money is at stake, never attribute to incompetence what can be attributed to greed. Yes, maybe some dingdong did this because they were stupid, and nobody bothered to check their work. But then you have to ask yourself: Why was a dingdong assigned to this task? Why was nobody competent assigned to check their work? And then hopefully you understand what's happening.
- kibibu 2y agoAlso possible is somebody using them as place holders (and telling people as much), which were plausible enough that they slipped through.