7 ms·
Yeah, if they'd messaged this release as a significant architecture change (that will be more significant over time, and in specific cases, like anything actual
by tarnith 2y ago
Yeah, if they'd messaged this release as a significant architecture change (that will be more significant over time, and in specific cases, like anything actually using a 512-bit data pipeline) and an efficiency gain they wouldn't be getting this reaction.
It's a much better release than many of the Intel refreshes, but the marketing leading up to it was quite bizarre compared to launch performance.
Moving the same performance down ~40w is great. Having better branch prediction, more registers, lower latency on many ops and double the SIMD width for no cost? Fantastic.
They sold it as a huge gaming gain that hasn't materialized, and then tried to say it was due to windows admin modes interfering with branch prediction (True, but equally seems to apply to Zen3/4)
If they'd sold this as a perf/W and backend architecture shift, they wouldn't be getting the reaction they're currently earning.
- tracker1 2y agoI think charging upwards of 1/3 more than prior gen sale pricing (today) also don't help the messaging.