7 ms·

RMS must be furious.

• dllthomas 14y ago
  As I understand things, he doesn't care so much about games.
  • wtetzner 14y ago
    I don't know, he seems to not care what the software does, if it's non-free it's unethical: http://www.curmudgeongamer.com/2007/04/richard-stallman-speaks-no-to-consoles.html http://www.curmudgeongamer.com/2007/04/richard-stallman-spea...
  • coffeeaddicted 14y ago
    Unity is not just about games, but more generally about 3D application development. And with Unity Web Player we even got a new closed source browser plugin that starts competing with Flash. I don't care about closed source games (generally I think it increases my freedom to have those compared to not having them at all - kind of like fun manacles which increase choice of action in some moments despite being used to restrict movement). But I do care about the base of software on which other software depends no longer being free and am a little worried about yet another proprietary browser plugin gaining popularity when flash is finally starting to get replaced by html.
    • dllthomas 14y ago
      Fair point.
    • Arelius 14y ago
      To be fair, if that's going to happen, it's going to happen if Unity is on Linux or not, Thus it's better to have it on Linux I figure.