6 ms·

Sometimes it's a reasonable choice to pay for software, especially if you're a large company that can easily afford it. It's not like "just using postgres" in a

by zachmu 2y ago

Sometimes it's a reasonable choice to pay for software, especially if you're a large company that can easily afford it. It's not like "just using postgres" in a manner similar to Cockroach's capabilities is trivial, building your own solution also has a whole set of risks. If you're absolutely opposed to ever paying for a software solution, then sure, avoid commercial projects. I'm happy to spend my (company's) money on useful software.

vdfs 2y ago
Without marketing bs, what's something that can be done only with Cockroach and not postgres or other truly-OSS alternatives? I'm curios because I've been reading news about it forever but never had the chance to work with it
- vvern 2y ago
  Transactional workloads over datasets in the single digit petabytes.
- zachmu 2y ago
  Think of it as a replacement for spanner with a postgres frontend. It's about global availability and replication without application-level sharding.