5 ms·
As DevOps engineer I've used and managed both Gitlab and Github extensively, and Gitlab is just so much better. Things make sense there. Shame that it's so darn
by levidos 2y ago
As DevOps engineer I've used and managed both Gitlab and Github extensively, and Gitlab is just so much better. Things make sense there. Shame that it's so darn expensive.
- cortesoft 2y agoAgreed, used to manage our GitHub enterprise and then lead the transition to Gitlab enterprise. Both cheaper and better, and open source.
- danpalmer 2y agoWhen you say managed, do you mean self hosting, or do you mean using the platforms for devops? I can see how GitHubs self hosting story might be worse, because it’s just not designed for that, most companies don’t do it anymore, and I believe the product is deprecated. As for doing devops from the platforms, I always found GitHub Actions better than GitLab CI, but I realise many feel the opposite.
- silisili 2y agoSame. Been using Gitlab for years, but joined a new company using Github. I was appalled by how bad everything is compared to Gitlab, but especially ci/runners vs actions.
- cyberpunk 2y agoDoes gh actions even support k8s native runners yet?
- Qerub 2y agoLooks like it: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/hosting-your-own-runners/managing-self-hosted-runners-with-actions-runner-controller/about-actions-runner-controller https://docs.github.com/en/actions/hosting-your-own-runners/...