7 ms·

You can’t really say it does or doesn’t. Research shows stress can be a contributor though. https://med.stanford.edu/survivingcancer/cancer-and-stress/stress-a

You can’t really say it does or doesn’t. Research shows stress can be a contributor though. https://med.stanford.edu/survivingcancer/cancer-and-stress/stress-and-cancer.html#:~:text=Many%20researchers%20have%20found%20that,to%20all%20sicknesses%2C%20including%20cancer https://med.stanford.edu/survivingcancer/cancer-and-stress/s....

roenxi 2y ago
Well, yeah. For the sort of people who have "Title: CEO" on their Wikipedia page I suspect we're overdrawing from the pool of people where mission implicitly matters a little more than taking it easy. One way or the other you're going to die, but if your response to that is to relax and try to eke out a few years by keeping your stress down then CEOing is probably not for you.
- cpncrunch 2y ago
  You can change it if you want to. An extra 25 years seems worth it to me.
amelius 2y ago
Being on the wrong side of the wealth-gap can also induce stress ...
cpncrunch 2y ago
Main factors are sleep, sunlight, diet and exercise as well as stress. You can see her schedule here: https://press.farm/susan-wojcickis-daily-routine-youtubes-ceo/ https://press.farm/susan-wojcickis-daily-routine-youtubes-ce... Sleep about 6hr, which isnt ideal. Not much chance to get sunlight which significantly reduces cancer incidence. Not much relaxing time. The question becomes, is the work worth it?
- A_D_E_P_T 2y ago
  That's probably not her real schedule. It looks like clickbait and was probably invented by the author. (Who might be our prolific friend Chat-GPT.) Besides 10:00pm to 5:30am is 7.5 hours, which is either optimal or (arguably) too much. Lastly, there's no clear evidence tying sleep duration to cancer incidence. See, e.g.: https://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12885-018-5025-y https://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12885-...
  - cpncrunch 2y ago
    She starts exercising at 530 and goes to bed at 10. Im assuming she wakes up 30 mins before, and it takes her an hour to get to sleep.
    - svnt 2y ago
      They weren’t arguing the specific times, but the article itself reads as if AI generated and not as a real report of someone’s schedule, by someone who would know that person’s schedule. The follow-on conclusion from that is that the times are highly suspect.
      - cpncrunch 2y ago
        Yes, i think youre correct. I cant find an original source.
    - theshackleford 2y ago
      Why would you assume an hour? That’s considered to be quite a long sleep latency. Your average individual is at like between 10-20 minutes.
      - cpncrunch 2y ago
        Yes, me too. I was just referring to the time between entering the bedroom and actually sleeping.
  - turtlesdown11 2y ago
    arguably too much sleep? what world are you living in that seven and a half hours of sleep is too much?
    - cpncrunch 2y ago
      6hr, as per my comment. Its enough for some people, but average is 7-8. I go to sleep 45-60 mins after going to bed, and i wake 30mins before exercising. Im assuming that is fairly typical.
- FireBy2024 2y ago
  Funny that watching YouTube was not one of the things she did, whereas most people spend hours on YouTube/social media.
- melling 2y ago
  Where’s your scientific report that says sunlight significantly reduces lung cancer? We shouldn’t have people making such claims on HN without providing references. She was also home having dinner with her family by 6:30pm.
  - cpncrunch 2y ago
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.12251 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.12251
    - melling 2y ago
      This seems key: “ Following sun exposure advice that is very restrictive in countries with low solar intensity might in fact be harmful to women's health.” Thanks for the link. Now we know with certainty that lack of sunlight wasn’t a cause.
      - cpncrunch 2y ago
        I think you have misinterpreted that sentence. It is saying that too little sun exposure is harmful to health in women. See also this study which found the same for men in Norway: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016950020600609X https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01695...
        melling 2y ago
        Yes, we agree. Very restrictive exposure in countries with low solar intensity “ Susan lived in Northern California. How’s the solar intensity where she lived? “ sun exposure advice that is very restrictive in countries with low solar intensity might in fact be harmful to women's health
        cpncrunch 2y ago
        Oslo is about half the UV of SF, so you would need to spend half as much time in the sun for the same benefit. If you are not outside much during the day, its still a risk factor no matter where you live. This would apply to most office workers.
- deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
- Mistletoe 2y ago
  I’ve tried to google with no success but is it known if she smoked or ever did? Or is she part of the unlucky cohort (~12.5%) of non-smokers that get lung cancer?

roenxi 2y ago

Well, yeah. For the sort of people who have "Title: CEO" on their Wikipedia page I suspect we're overdrawing from the pool of people where mission implicitly matters a little more than taking it easy. One way or the other you're going to die, but if your response to that is to relax and try to eke out a few years by keeping your stress down then CEOing is probably not for you.

cpncrunch 2y ago
You can change it if you want to. An extra 25 years seems worth it to me.

amelius 2y ago

Being on the wrong side of the wealth-gap can also induce stress ...

cpncrunch 2y ago

Main factors are sleep, sunlight, diet and exercise as well as stress. You can see her schedule here: https://press.farm/susan-wojcickis-daily-routine-youtubes-ceo/ https://press.farm/susan-wojcickis-daily-routine-youtubes-ce... Sleep about 6hr, which isnt ideal. Not much chance to get sunlight which significantly reduces cancer incidence. Not much relaxing time. The question becomes, is the work worth it?

A_D_E_P_T 2y ago
That's probably not her real schedule. It looks like clickbait and was probably invented by the author. (Who might be our prolific friend Chat-GPT.) Besides 10:00pm to 5:30am is 7.5 hours, which is either optimal or (arguably) too much. Lastly, there's no clear evidence tying sleep duration to cancer incidence. See, e.g.: https://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12885-018-5025-y https://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12885-...
- cpncrunch 2y ago
  She starts exercising at 530 and goes to bed at 10. Im assuming she wakes up 30 mins before, and it takes her an hour to get to sleep.
  - svnt 2y ago
    They weren’t arguing the specific times, but the article itself reads as if AI generated and not as a real report of someone’s schedule, by someone who would know that person’s schedule. The follow-on conclusion from that is that the times are highly suspect.
    - cpncrunch 2y ago
      Yes, i think youre correct. I cant find an original source.
  - theshackleford 2y ago
    Why would you assume an hour? That’s considered to be quite a long sleep latency. Your average individual is at like between 10-20 minutes.
    - cpncrunch 2y ago
      Yes, me too. I was just referring to the time between entering the bedroom and actually sleeping.
- turtlesdown11 2y ago
  arguably too much sleep? what world are you living in that seven and a half hours of sleep is too much?
  - cpncrunch 2y ago
    6hr, as per my comment. Its enough for some people, but average is 7-8. I go to sleep 45-60 mins after going to bed, and i wake 30mins before exercising. Im assuming that is fairly typical.
FireBy2024 2y ago
Funny that watching YouTube was not one of the things she did, whereas most people spend hours on YouTube/social media.
melling 2y ago
Where’s your scientific report that says sunlight significantly reduces lung cancer? We shouldn’t have people making such claims on HN without providing references. She was also home having dinner with her family by 6:30pm.
- cpncrunch 2y ago
  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.12251 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.12251
  - melling 2y ago
    This seems key: “ Following sun exposure advice that is very restrictive in countries with low solar intensity might in fact be harmful to women's health.” Thanks for the link. Now we know with certainty that lack of sunlight wasn’t a cause.
    - cpncrunch 2y ago
      I think you have misinterpreted that sentence. It is saying that too little sun exposure is harmful to health in women. See also this study which found the same for men in Norway: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016950020600609X https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01695...
      - melling 2y ago
        Yes, we agree. Very restrictive exposure in countries with low solar intensity “ Susan lived in Northern California. How’s the solar intensity where she lived? “ sun exposure advice that is very restrictive in countries with low solar intensity might in fact be harmful to women's health
        cpncrunch 2y ago
        Oslo is about half the UV of SF, so you would need to spend half as much time in the sun for the same benefit. If you are not outside much during the day, its still a risk factor no matter where you live. This would apply to most office workers.
deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
Mistletoe 2y ago
I’ve tried to google with no success but is it known if she smoked or ever did? Or is she part of the unlucky cohort (~12.5%) of non-smokers that get lung cancer?