5 ms·
> force you to publish a false update. I see. That's the compelled speech that the first amendment protects against, as outlined in the EFF FAQ [0]. Interest
by tithe 2y ago
> force you to publish a false update.
I see. That's the compelled speech that the first amendment protects against, as outlined in the EFF FAQ [0]. Interesting.
[0] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/warrant-canary-faq https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/warrant-canary-faq
- akerl_ 2y agoThis falls apart when you consider that courts aren't robots. I couldn't stand on a street corner and swing my arm every day, and when eventually my fist collides with somebody, claim to the court "oh, I didn't assault him, I swing my fist every day in this arc and he just got in my way". Likewise, for warrant canaries, it's unlikely that the court would consider it compelled speech when the entire premise is to use repeated speech to subvert the court's rulings.
- radishingr 2y agoThe Roberts court is fine with compelled speech, so long as it is as antiabortion. So I assume the same can be applied here.