6 ms·

whats also puzzling is giving away the foundation model the llamas will be used to pollute the social media reducing their value to advertizers

ai4ever 2y ago
I am surprised to see this: https://www.404media.co/where-facebooks-ai-slop-comes-from/ https://www.404media.co/where-facebooks-ai-slop-comes-from/ dont know how valid this is, but encouraging ai-slop as a business strategy to keep sticky customers !
Zambyte 2y ago
I wonder if they have a watermark built in that allows them to detect text generated by Llama easily. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZJc1p6RE78 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZJc1p6RE78 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.10226 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.10226
- _heimdall 2y ago
  I'd be suprised if they weren't making sure that Facebook could recognize content made with their tooling. Watermarks will always be on the honors system though, people could always remove them before posting.
  - jazzyjackson 2y ago
    For all the talk about safety it's surprising to me how little watermarking is going on, these AI producers are content with generating unmarked garbage. I figure there's a lot you could do with interwoven zerowidth space characters and other unicode tricks (using other code blocks for otherwise normal characters like you would when spoofing a url) - sure it would be easy to write software to normalize it back to ascii but at least that requires intent to deceive - we could even write laws against stripping encoding schemes meant to identify automated content Prior art is that time Genius encoded "red handed" into morse code by way of alternating apostrophes to catch Google copying their lyrics: https://gizmodo.com/genius-claims-it-busted-google-stealing-by-hiding-a-sec-1835582388 https://gizmodo.com/genius-claims-it-busted-google-stealing-...
    - _heimdall 2y ago
      If I'm not mistaken, didn't the major LLM companies try to band together for watermarking type features only to walk it back later and admit it wouldn't work?

ai4ever 2y ago

I am surprised to see this: https://www.404media.co/where-facebooks-ai-slop-comes-from/ https://www.404media.co/where-facebooks-ai-slop-comes-from/ dont know how valid this is, but encouraging ai-slop as a business strategy to keep sticky customers !

Zambyte 2y ago

I wonder if they have a watermark built in that allows them to detect text generated by Llama easily. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZJc1p6RE78 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZJc1p6RE78 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.10226 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.10226

_heimdall 2y ago
I'd be suprised if they weren't making sure that Facebook could recognize content made with their tooling. Watermarks will always be on the honors system though, people could always remove them before posting.
- jazzyjackson 2y ago
  For all the talk about safety it's surprising to me how little watermarking is going on, these AI producers are content with generating unmarked garbage. I figure there's a lot you could do with interwoven zerowidth space characters and other unicode tricks (using other code blocks for otherwise normal characters like you would when spoofing a url) - sure it would be easy to write software to normalize it back to ascii but at least that requires intent to deceive - we could even write laws against stripping encoding schemes meant to identify automated content Prior art is that time Genius encoded "red handed" into morse code by way of alternating apostrophes to catch Google copying their lyrics: https://gizmodo.com/genius-claims-it-busted-google-stealing-by-hiding-a-sec-1835582388 https://gizmodo.com/genius-claims-it-busted-google-stealing-...
  - _heimdall 2y ago
    If I'm not mistaken, didn't the major LLM companies try to band together for watermarking type features only to walk it back later and admit it wouldn't work?