5 ms·
I think they are not referring to ls, but to exa [0], which is not maintained anymore. [0]https://github.com/ogham/exa https://github.com/ogham/exa
by coffeeri 2y ago
I think they are not referring to ls, but to exa [0], which is not maintained anymore.
[0]https://github.com/ogham/exa https://github.com/ogham/exa
- Izkata 2y agoNo, they definitely mean "ls": > By deliberately making some decisions differently, eza attempts to be a more featureful, more user-friendly version of ls.
- coffeeri 2y agoYes, it is marketed as a better “ls”. I was commenting regarding “maintained” in: > A modern, maintained replacement for ls. “Maintained” is referring to exa I think.
- kazinator 2y agoRight; since the sentence mentions ls, of course, it must be referring to something other than ls. Like when your wife finds a sexier, more romantic replacement for you, of course she's not comparing anyone to you. (Nobody is sexier or more romantic than you.) She means sexier and more romantic replacement compared to the previous lover she's just broken up with.
- lynndotpy 2y agoYes, exactly this. The original `exa`'s description is > exa is a modern replacement for `ls` and it seems `eza` very recently changed the README to match that, given the confusion. At the time, emphasizing it was actively maintained (in comparison to `exa`) made sense, but by now, `eza` has about 5x more daily downloads than `exa`: - https://crates.io/crates/eza https://crates.io/crates/eza - https://crates.io/crates/exa https://crates.io/crates/exa
- cafkafk 2y agoWe do not
- verdverm 2y ago> A modern, maintained replacement for ls. The tag line certainly reads that way (first line in the readme)