9 ms·
Am I missing something here? The minutes give no real details about anything It's all rather vague
by LeeCyriaca 2y ago
Am I missing something here? The minutes give no real details about anything
It's all rather vague
- giancarlostoro 2y agoI'm not sure, but code of conduct was breached, so could be the usual whenever code of conduct is brought up.
- p-e-w 2y agoThe code of conduct consists of individual provisions, articles, and paragraphs. It should be easy (in fact, it should be a prerequisite for such actions being taken) to cite the specific provisions of the CoC that were supposedly violated, and to enter that information into the record. That this didn't happen speaks volumes.
- funcDropShadow 2y agoHow do you know "code of conduct was breached"? We only know that there was a complaint, that it was breached.
- CRConrad 2y agoAFAIK, the word "breached" can also be interpreted as "brought up in discussion". So maybe that was what the GP meant.
- CRConrad 2y agoOr, come to think of it, is the phrase "the subject was broached in the discussion" what I was thinking of? Note the 'o', not 'e'. Sorry, now I'm thinking I was wrong above.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- p-e-w 2y agoPower wants to avoid accountability, and therefore it avoids transparency wherever possible. No surprise there, and no different from what happens in corporate boards where consensus is established by board members glancing meaningfully at each other, so the agreement doesn't enter the record. I've long observed the governing bodies of GNOME, Mozilla, and Wikimedia (whose composition doesn't reflect the composition of the community, to put it mildly) to act like mediocre corporate boards, and I'm sure the same power structures and patterns of behavior can be found in other large open source projects.
- IAmNotACellist 2y agoOf course, now they hide it under a veneer of concern and protecting hypothetical victims.