7 ms·
Agreed - but on the other hand (no flippancy intended) it's not hard to imagine AI would have done a better job in this instance.
by tnjm 2y ago
Agreed - but on the other hand (no flippancy intended) it's not hard to imagine AI would have done a better job in this instance.
- shinycode 2y agoYou have a point, the problem is that AI might be better in some instances but in other instances for example insurance, banking, medical, in more critical cases, having an opaque system with wrong and rigid rules is worst than a nightmare. But everyone will jump on the bandwagon, not only the less problematic cases (I thing we agree that not buying a book might be considered less important than not receiving medical care) but everyone. In somes instances if AI does a worst job the consequences on human life might be terrible
- surfingdino 2y ago> ... the problem is that AI might be better in some instances ... It's not good for anything. Every time you spot how useless it is for a specific task, the AI fans say you are using it wrong and for the wrong purpose, and please give it more data and time to get better. It's garbage and the VC money is running out. It'll become a forgotten acronym soon.
- latentsea 2y agoPlease give it more time. It will get better.
- surfingdino 2y agoI'd wager they are using AI to ban books, so no, AI will not do a better job.