7 ms·
that would be wcslcpy(3)
by ben_bai 2y ago
that would be wcslcpy(3)
- asveikau 2y agoNope. Unicode correctness is much more complicated than switching char to wchar_t. Many glyphs take multiple codepoints or multiple character units in either utf-16 or utf-8. You need something like the break iterator "character" separator in ICU.