5 ms·
You really need to learn about the burden of proof, since you'd (hopefully) be able to figure out that in this case, the burden of proof is on you to prove what
by methodical 2y ago
You really need to learn about the burden of proof, since you'd (hopefully) be able to figure out that in this case, the burden of proof is on you to prove what you're saying is accurate. HN isn't a place for hand waving arguments where your only supporting proof is "logic".
- RyanAdamas 2y ago[flagged]
- methodical 2y agoThe irony is palpable. Stating your position and then never providing any supporting proof is not a "valid and sound" argument.
- RyanAdamas 2y agoThe truth of the premises do not require empirical evidence as you seem to require, they require the premises be true. - Oncology is a for-profit business - Curing customers reduces profits - Treating customers increases profits - Curing cancer is bad for business Do you understand how logic works or is your brain fried by "where's the study bro..." Give me a break, man. Do you have any interest in sincerity or is your job at stake otherwise?