5 ms·
It may not be quite that simple, see hiQ Labs vs LinkedIn[1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._
by minhazm 2y ago
It may not be quite that simple, see hiQ Labs vs LinkedIn[1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn
- IWantAllTheData 2y agoWill check it out thanks. I'm always ready to take down the site if TikTok reach out me to.
- Oras 2y agoThat's not about public data. Reference [7] talked about creating fake accounts to scrape. > hiQ had prevailed on the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) “unauthorized access” issue related to public website data but was facing a ruling that it had breached LinkedIn’s User Agreement due to its scraping and creation of fake accounts (subject to its equitable defenses). https://natlawreview.com/article/hiq-and-linkedin-reach-proposed-settlement-landmark-scraping-case https://natlawreview.com/article/hiq-and-linkedin-reach-prop...
- IWantAllTheData 2y agoSo many useful stuffs in the comments. Thank you, will give this a read as well.