6 ms·
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
by takeoutweight 14y ago
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
- Paradigma11 14y agoBut it is, at least from a bayesian perspective.
- dbecker 14y agoNot at all. Even from a Bayesian perspective, having a small sample that is too small to reach strong conclusions does not shift your posterior towards 0.