7 ms·
>This assumes the court can even hear cases in a reasonable amount of time. If it's a bandwidth issue, reducing the number of extra-judicial bureaucrats and up
by deveac 2y ago
>This assumes the court can even hear cases in a reasonable amount of time.
If it's a bandwidth issue, reducing the number of extra-judicial bureaucrats and upping the number of judiciary is pretty straightforward. Seems like a pretty simple rebalancing issue.
>Now it's, better hope you don't lose an injunction and you get a judge capable of understanding the technical reasons
Why would experts (like those that were informing executive agencies on their payroll) not be called here?
- CuriouslyC 2y agoBecause the judiciary has been so performant as of late.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- anigbrowl 2y agoThe judiciary depends on Congress for its funding, and is perennially underfunded. Arguably this suits the legislative branch because a clogged judicial pipeline encourages people to pursue legislative relief.