The argument for is a mixture of textualism and moral repugnance at the idea of letting the Sacklers keeping billions in profits they made from killing a quarte

The argument for is a mixture of textualism and moral repugnance at the idea of letting the Sacklers keeping billions in profits they made from killing a quarter of a million people. I suspect the second part was strengthened to swing Jackson's vote and aside from her, it's a fairly standard split.