6 ms·
Agree entirely on principle, but nobody should be dehumanized, if nothing else because it is a very ineffective way to model your opponent. And hurting other f
by thegiogi 2y ago
Agree entirely on principle, but nobody should be dehumanized, if nothing else because it is a very ineffective way to model your opponent.
And hurting other for greed is surely not humane, but it is very much human. Big difference that e at the end.
- lxgr 2y agoModeling a group of people, answerable to yet another, even larger group of people, as “a person” is what I would call even worse modeling.
- robertlagrant 2y agoIt's not that a company is a person. It's that it's multiple people, some of whom make decisions.
- lxgr 2y agoExactly, and groups of people behave differently from a single person in many important ways.
- robertlagrant 2y agoYes - they have more legs. But what they are not is a homogenised mass, all as equally guilty or innocent of issues as the other. If 3 executives do something bad, those 3 executives are to blame. And not some nothing-to-do-with-people corporation.
- lxgr 2y agoI agree! That's why I didn't say "are culpable differently" but "behave differently".
- DiggyJohnson 2y agoOne of HN's biggest intellectual blind spots is mistaking explanation with justification. Looks like your comment was caught up in that.