6 ms·
You've got it completely backwards. If you have a piece of evidence with a high signal-to-noise ratio, you don't validate that with a mechanism that has an extr
by chimeracoder 2y ago
You've got it completely backwards. If you have a piece of evidence with a high signal-to-noise ratio, you don't validate that with a mechanism that has an extremely low signal-to-noise ratio. That's completely scientifically and statistically unsound.
- namaria 2y agoWhat GP is implying is using the high signal to noise ratio evidence to give you a better way to screen the low signal to noise ration evidence and check for extra information. Not using the former to 'validate' the latter.