5 ms·
The way they’re using hard-fork and soft-fork, is that based on the blockchain usage of the words? If so, that makes it hard for me to take seriously!
by thecodedmessage 2y ago
The way they’re using hard-fork and soft-fork, is that based on the blockchain usage of the words? If so, that makes it hard for me to take seriously!
- zaphod420 2y agoI think a better term would have been "non-breaking backwards compatible change". hard/soft forks are very much the jargon used when talking about ways to upgrade blockchain based protocols.
- celdon25 2y agoIt’s a bit disingenuous to mention that without acknowledging that it was an open source terminology first. https://producingoss.com/en/forks.html#:~:text=A%20hard%20fork%20is%20when,line%20with%20their%20own%20vision https://producingoss.com/en/forks.html#:~:text=A%20hard%20fo....
- celdon25 2y agoI’m no blockchain fan, but… wow. So much to unpack there. I’m not sure taking it seriously was ever on the table.
- tripleo1 2y ago??: https://forgejo.org/compare-to-gitea/#why-was-forgejo-created https://forgejo.org/compare-to-gitea/#why-was-forgejo-create...