7 ms·
I mean it was famously tested in 2015 after the San Bernardino attack. Apple didn’t back down [1] and later sued the company who sold the zero-day to the govt t
by riscy 2y ago
I mean it was famously tested in 2015 after the San Bernardino attack. Apple didn’t back down [1] and later sued the company who sold the zero-day to the govt to unlock the phone [2].
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple%E2%80%93FBI_encryption_dispute https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple%E2%80%93FBI_encryption...
[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/04/14/azimuth-san-bernardino-apple-iphone-fbi/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/04/14/azimuth...
- asadotzler 2y agoAlso famously tested (and failed) much more recently. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/12/apple-admits-to-secretly-giving-governments-push-notification-data/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/12/apple-admits-to-... Apple shills are the worst.
- astrange 2y agoThat's an ordinary subpoena and that data is not being specially collected and not e2ee encrypted. Has nothing to do with the guarantee in this article.
- theshrike79 2y agoPush notifications are on a whole different level than "full access to your phone".