6 ms·

Raycast - Replaces Spotlight for opening applications - Replaces Magnet for window management, same features but don’t have to run a separate app now. - keep

Raycast - Replaces Spotlight for opening applications - Replaces Magnet for window management, same features but don’t have to run a separate app now. - keeps a clipboard history - allows me to convert colours and units - integrates with my calendar to show me upcoming meetings, shows them in my menu bar and lets me join them with one click - allows me to prevent my Mac from sleeping (for certain durations) with caffeinate command - has a variety of plugins available Probably forgetting a lot of things I use it for, but even without the premium features I use it all the time.

FractalHQ 2y ago
I came here to scream Raycast… but this is a great breakdown. Raycast replaces _so many_ apps (and even web browser functionality) for me, and I’m not even on the Pro tier. To your list, I would add app shortcuts / key commands / quick links / snippets / code image generators (optically from selection) to name a few.
TheRealWatson 2y ago
I wish the Pro version wasn't subscription based. I'd pay a one time cost even if they dropped the stuff that needs server support (AI, Sync, whatever).
- CharlesW 2y ago
  Please send them that feedback! I did, and I hope they don’t mind me sharing their response: Thanks for reaching out and for the feedback. Pricing, like everything else at Raycast, is something we will continuously evaluate and try to balance between what is best for our users and also for us as a company. And on this subject we are indeed looking into the possibility of offering a cheaper Pro Plan (lite version) subscription without AI for example or even offering a lifetime license with additional benefits outside the app. So more on this subject to come soon. Best, — Daniel Sequeira Engineering Manager at Raycast
- danpalmer 2y ago
  I wish the Pro separated AI and everything else. I can’t use the AI stuff at work for contractual reasons, but it’s also clear that most of the cost goes into that. I’m not paying $10/m for longer clipboard history, but I’d probably pay $50 one off for all the local-only bits. Problem is that they’re VC backed and you don’t get SaaS valuations on selling a ton of single-purchase software.
danpalmer 2y ago
I was a big Quicksilver user. I was a big Alfred user (from literal day 1). I’m now a big Raycast user. In fact Raycast is the only one where I’ve developed my own extensions (beyond basic toy scripts), the extension model is very good (even if distribution is iffy).
pmarreck 2y ago
Link?
- bigsweatshirt 2y ago
  raycast.com
SebastianKra 2y ago
Also, it has by far the best plugin system I've ever seen. It combines all the best practices from Web-Development with their own custom React-reconciler. You can write fairly sophisticated UIs with less effort than for a shell script. If a FOSS version of this ever takes off, it could have the potential to replace terminal-UIs outright.
jamil7 2y ago
It's good but VC backed. Also the actual file search is really bad.
aosaigh 2y ago
Is Raycast better than Alfred? Or mostly the same?
- wlonkly 2y ago
  Tough question. Alfred never really clicked for me, Raycast clicked right away, but I can't put my finger on why.
- lycopodiopsida 2y ago
  IMO No. Raycast: - Took VC money and pushes for subscription instead of a clear payment model. - Rides the AI Hype train. - Is still not able to handle file workflows properly. - Alfred workflows are easier to write and to debug due to workflow editor, you have to be a web developer to find the proposition of writing what is basically a small react app a good one. - Also, IMO, not very fast, consumes a lot of resources and has a clumsy UX due to using stateful multistep apps. I would always prefer Alfred to Raycast, but I am stuck with Launchbar which is still the Launcher with most smooth workflow for me. The whole <Object><Action> paradigm is just so fast - select something, tab, match an app with 2 keystrokes-enter -> Opens in app. Works on text, files, whatever.
  - dinkleberg 2y ago
    Yeah the fact that the first thing I see on their landing page is about AI has me peacing out.

FractalHQ 2y ago

I came here to scream Raycast… but this is a great breakdown. Raycast replaces _so many_ apps (and even web browser functionality) for me, and I’m not even on the Pro tier. To your list, I would add app shortcuts / key commands / quick links / snippets / code image generators (optically from selection) to name a few.

TheRealWatson 2y ago

I wish the Pro version wasn't subscription based. I'd pay a one time cost even if they dropped the stuff that needs server support (AI, Sync, whatever).

CharlesW 2y ago
Please send them that feedback! I did, and I hope they don’t mind me sharing their response: Thanks for reaching out and for the feedback. Pricing, like everything else at Raycast, is something we will continuously evaluate and try to balance between what is best for our users and also for us as a company. And on this subject we are indeed looking into the possibility of offering a cheaper Pro Plan (lite version) subscription without AI for example or even offering a lifetime license with additional benefits outside the app. So more on this subject to come soon. Best, — Daniel Sequeira Engineering Manager at Raycast
danpalmer 2y ago
I wish the Pro separated AI and everything else. I can’t use the AI stuff at work for contractual reasons, but it’s also clear that most of the cost goes into that. I’m not paying $10/m for longer clipboard history, but I’d probably pay $50 one off for all the local-only bits. Problem is that they’re VC backed and you don’t get SaaS valuations on selling a ton of single-purchase software.

danpalmer 2y ago

I was a big Quicksilver user. I was a big Alfred user (from literal day 1). I’m now a big Raycast user. In fact Raycast is the only one where I’ve developed my own extensions (beyond basic toy scripts), the extension model is very good (even if distribution is iffy).

pmarreck 2y ago

Link?

bigsweatshirt 2y ago
raycast.com

SebastianKra 2y ago

Also, it has by far the best plugin system I've ever seen. It combines all the best practices from Web-Development with their own custom React-reconciler. You can write fairly sophisticated UIs with less effort than for a shell script. If a FOSS version of this ever takes off, it could have the potential to replace terminal-UIs outright.

jamil7 2y ago

It's good but VC backed. Also the actual file search is really bad.

aosaigh 2y ago

Is Raycast better than Alfred? Or mostly the same?

wlonkly 2y ago
Tough question. Alfred never really clicked for me, Raycast clicked right away, but I can't put my finger on why.
lycopodiopsida 2y ago
IMO No. Raycast: - Took VC money and pushes for subscription instead of a clear payment model. - Rides the AI Hype train. - Is still not able to handle file workflows properly. - Alfred workflows are easier to write and to debug due to workflow editor, you have to be a web developer to find the proposition of writing what is basically a small react app a good one. - Also, IMO, not very fast, consumes a lot of resources and has a clumsy UX due to using stateful multistep apps. I would always prefer Alfred to Raycast, but I am stuck with Launchbar which is still the Launcher with most smooth workflow for me. The whole <Object><Action> paradigm is just so fast - select something, tab, match an app with 2 keystrokes-enter -> Opens in app. Works on text, files, whatever.
- dinkleberg 2y ago
  Yeah the fact that the first thing I see on their landing page is about AI has me peacing out.