5 ms·
It seems that the "mpt" who owns that domain today and is responsible for this article is not the same as the "mpt" that wrote the original article [1]. [1] ht
by hoppipolla 14y ago
It seems that the "mpt" who owns that domain today and is responsible for this article is not the same as the "mpt" that wrote the original article [1].
[1] https://twitter.com/mpt/status/209033178705436672 https://twitter.com/mpt/status/209033178705436672
- statictype 14y agoWow. That's kind of shady isn't it (for the new owner to write a similar article and then redirect the older one to the newer one)?