6 ms·
What is the use case? Trail cameras already do this and they cost $50 instead of $200 with better photo quality and better motion sensing. Oh and they take vid
by whatahw 2y ago
What is the use case? Trail cameras already do this and they cost $50 instead of $200 with better photo quality and better motion sensing.
Oh and they take video too.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- ocal5 2y ago> better photo quality and better motion sensing Would you have some specific model in mind, and what aspects of photo quality & motion sensing are better ? For sure, I never seen a so nicely managed battery life.
- whatahw 2y agoHis camera costs $200 and takes 3MP photos with no video capability and poor low light performance. A $50 trail cam will take at least 10MP photos, will have night vision and will be able to take videos. People have left trail cams out for over a year and they were still taking photos. Battery life is cool, but if existing devices already have more life than anyone needs what's the point?
- dsalzman 2y agoTrail cameras are much larger. So if size is a restraint this could be better, but valid point. Most trail cameras use 8x AA batteries!
- euniceee3 2y agoI can customize the code for this project where I cant with a trail cam. I wish my $50 trail cam would do timelapse and motion detection at the same time. Really I want timelapsed phones and videos if motion detection. Plus all the other reasons others said.