7 ms·
Just as a reminder for folks. This California based position falls under pay transparency laws -- "Effective January 1, 2023, California Senate Bill 1162 (SB 1
by aartav 2y ago
Just as a reminder for folks. This California based position falls under pay transparency laws -- "Effective January 1, 2023, California Senate Bill 1162 (SB 1162) requires employers to disclose pay scales on all position postings". The linked position posting doesn't include this.
- dang 2y agoOf course I agree, but these comments have become so common as to be noise, making them off topic for HN. We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40563855 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40563855.
- Sponge5 2y agoI wouldn't call this noise.. The job poster knows the rules and decides to break them anyway. Potentional applicants should be made aware of that.
- dang 2y agoAnything this common becomes noise, since it doesn't add any new information. Heres' another way to look at it: since the idea of HN is to be intellectually interesting (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sort=byDate&type=comment&query=curiosity%20optimiz%20by:dang https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...), repetition is the most important thing to avoid (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&sort=byDate&type=comment&query=curiosity%20repetition%20by:dang https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...).
- Sponge5 2y agoI'd say the Who's hiring post is by definition bound to not have intellectually stimulating discussion, so this logic doesn't track for me.
- dang 2y agoThat's a good point! But I'd still say (1) we don't want it to be a thing anywhere on HN, and also (2) these threads are already overwhelmingly large.
- Sponge5 2y agoI understand where you're coming from.. My takeaway is that a HN post is not the right tool for the job in this case. (pun not intended)