5 ms·
For me, a very simple "breakdown tasks into a queue and store in a DB" solution has help tremendously with most requests. Instead of trying to do everything in
by hugocbp 2y ago
For me, a very simple "breakdown tasks into a queue and store in a DB" solution has help tremendously with most requests.
Instead of trying to do everything into a single chat or chain, add steps to ask the LLM to break down the next tasks, with context, and store that into SQLite or something. Then start new chats/chains on each of those tasks.
Then just loop them back into LLM.
I find that long chats or chains just confuse most models and we start seeing gibberish.
Right now I'm favoring something like:
"We're going to do task {task}. The current situation and context is {context}.
Break down what individual steps we need to perform to achieve {goal} and output these steps with their necessary context as {standard_task_json}. If the output is already enough to satisfy {goal}, just output the result as text."
I find that leaving everything to LLM in a sequence is not as effective as using LLM to break things down and having a DB and code logic to support the development of more complex outcomes.
- datameta 2y agoIndeed! If I'm met with several misunderstandings in a row, asking it to explain what I'm trying to do is a pretty surefire way to move forward. Also mentioning what to "forget" or not focus on anymore seems to remove some noise from the responses if they are large.