7 ms·
(just to be clear, I have no clue wether HIV was assisted by some military programmes, but I can safely say such "mistakes" have been made in the past by the sa
by Morg 14y ago
(just to be clear, I have no clue wether HIV was assisted by some military programmes, but I can safely say such "mistakes" have been made in the past by the same army, like when they used to test nukes for example)
That means I just used the HIV word to connect to the concept of bio weapon testing gone wrong - weapon testing gone wrong.
The reason why is that one of the most popular theories on HIV is that the US military had a part in its development.
I don't know and I don't care, those people have such a bad karma even AIDS wouldn't make much difference - just read the disclaimer next time ;)
- dpark 14y ago> That means I just used the HIV word to connect to the concept of bio weapon testing gone wrong - weapon testing gone wrong. This means you just randomly connected unrelated things. The connection doesn't even make sense at a basic level. If the US knowingly put sailors in boats near nuclear blasts to test for radiation effects, it wasn't a mistake. It was an intentional act. It makes no sense to say that this implies that super-HIV could have been accidentally released in the wild by the US government. > The reason why is that one of the most popular theories on HIV is that the US military had a part in its development. Popular among conspiracy theorists, perhaps, not among the general population or among experts in the field.