5 ms·
But none of that was a reason to invoke the Emergencies Act, per the courts.
by poochipie 2y ago
But none of that was a reason to invoke the Emergencies Act, per the courts.
- graeme 2y agoThe emergencies act is extremely restrictive. The criteria: >There must be an urgent, critical and temporary situation that “seriously endangers” the lives, health and safety of Canadians, and it must be so significant as to exceed the capacity or authority of the provinces to address it. A foreign funded group with heavy vehicles invaded and took over downtown Ottawa and international border crossings. The province wasn't interested in dispersing them. The Emergencies Act definition wouldn't allow you to halt a coup attempt if Ontario could handle it but chose not to. At a certain point you have to analyze things and say that if the law has a massive loophole then the law was poorly drafted.
- adamomada 2y agoThe emergency act was used after the bridges were clear, to stop a peaceful protest in the nations capital that pissed off the minority government. You can go on YouTube and see endless live video streams of it. At no time were any lives in danger. “You can’t protest, there’s a government here!” - Ottawa residents
- jmb99 2y agoI would argue that >90dB measured inside apartments for weeks on end 24/7 isn’t peaceful.