5 ms·
I think this is incorrect because it assumes the job offers are equal. My understanding is that it is much more like two chronically unemployed people: the firs
by TeaDrunk 2y ago
I think this is incorrect because it assumes the job offers are equal. My understanding is that it is much more like two chronically unemployed people: the first doesn't get an interview 99% of the time, the second one is 99% only offered MLM job interviews where they're expected to "invest in themselves first" by buying the MLM product aka scams.
- megadal 2y agoI think generally the quality of interactions both sexes have with the opposite sex on these apps is roughly equal. That said, even by this analogy, that would imply the 1% of the time the first person gets an interview, it is also likely a scam or a non-start 99% of the time. So the second person is still 100x as likely to find a job as the first person. The market just happens to suck for everyone.