11 ms·
I have found the below to be a good starting point for formulating text into classical formulated arguments. Intake the following block of text and then formul
by andrewdb 2y ago
I have found the below to be a good starting point for formulating text into classical formulated arguments.
Intake the following block of text and then formulate it as a steelmanned deductive argument. Use the format of premises and conclusion. After the argument, list possible fallacies in the argument. DO NOT fact check - simply analyze the logic. do not search.
format in the following manner:
Premise N: Premise N Text
ETC
Conclusion:
Conclusion text
Output in English
[the block of text to analze]
- sandspar 2y agoUseful, thanks. Note that the "after the argument, list fallacies" part can be swapped out for other lists. For example: 1. Evaluate Argument Strength: Assess the strength of each premise and the overall argument. [ChatGPT is an ass kisser so always says "strong"] 2. Provide Counterarguments: Suggest possible counterarguments to the premises and conclusion. 3. Highlight Assumptions: Identify any underlying assumptions that need examination. 4. Suggest Improvements: Recommend ways to strengthen the argument's logical structure. 5. Test with Scenarios: Apply the argument to various scenarios to see how it holds up. 6. Analyze Relevance: Check the relevance and connection between each premise and the conclusion.
- andrewdb 2y agoThose are good suggestions. I will use some of them! It is also interesting to go back and forth with the model, asking it to mitigate fallacies listed, and then re-check for fallacies, then mitigate again, etc, etc. I have found that a workflow using pytube into OpenAPI Whisper into the above prompt is a decent way of breaking down a YouTube video into formulated arguments.