6 ms·

I think I would be more likely to use this if it were a subscription model despite usually hating subscriptions. Looking for a job is a time bound process and

I think I would be more likely to use this if it were a subscription model despite usually hating subscriptions. Looking for a job is a time bound process and I want to know that I have full access to the tools needed for the entire time it takes to find a job. During my most recent job search the 15 rewrites may have lasted me less than a week. I was using ChatGPT to tweak every resume I submitted.

prodtorok 2y ago
Thanks for the feedback. Yea, the rewrites are needed. Users don't always know what they want right off the bat, and it hits them later on. Our original goal was to help people get their resume going and into a nice-looking doc asap. College students we interviewed were adamantly against subscriptions, so we pivoted. We realize it's a more effort for seasoned professionals. We're going to increase the cheapest offering to at least 2. GPT-4 has some cost limits, but we're actively figuring out how to squeeze more value for users. Our dream is to "speak to your document" and we're evaluating if we can and should try to get there. We think we have innovations in the word processing space... obviously it's not the safest area to play in with MSFT looking to innovate their own products with Agents.
- richardw 2y ago
  Honestly, don’t base your main pricing on college students. Maybe have a deal if they sign up with their college email address. For the rest, price for the customers you want.
  - deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
  - nramos3 2y ago
    It’s a great idea. I could also see pricing for professionals that are creating many iterations for many industries and roles. Something in a larger bulk, but favorably priced
- heywoods 2y ago
  I hope it’s okay that I am contacting you regarding a bug here. I purchased the standard package that offers 7 resume creations but after completing the purchase it says I only have 5 available to generate.
  - deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
  - prodtorok 2y ago
    Sorry for the trouble! Fixed now. You should see 10.
    - heywoods 2y ago
      thank you!
alok-g 2y ago
For me, it is the other way around. I prefer a pay by use model.

prodtorok 2y ago

Thanks for the feedback. Yea, the rewrites are needed. Users don't always know what they want right off the bat, and it hits them later on. Our original goal was to help people get their resume going and into a nice-looking doc asap. College students we interviewed were adamantly against subscriptions, so we pivoted. We realize it's a more effort for seasoned professionals. We're going to increase the cheapest offering to at least 2. GPT-4 has some cost limits, but we're actively figuring out how to squeeze more value for users. Our dream is to "speak to your document" and we're evaluating if we can and should try to get there. We think we have innovations in the word processing space... obviously it's not the safest area to play in with MSFT looking to innovate their own products with Agents.

richardw 2y ago
Honestly, don’t base your main pricing on college students. Maybe have a deal if they sign up with their college email address. For the rest, price for the customers you want.
- deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
- nramos3 2y ago
  It’s a great idea. I could also see pricing for professionals that are creating many iterations for many industries and roles. Something in a larger bulk, but favorably priced
heywoods 2y ago
I hope it’s okay that I am contacting you regarding a bug here. I purchased the standard package that offers 7 resume creations but after completing the purchase it says I only have 5 available to generate.
- deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
- prodtorok 2y ago
  Sorry for the trouble! Fixed now. You should see 10.
  - heywoods 2y ago
    thank you!

alok-g 2y ago

For me, it is the other way around. I prefer a pay by use model.