8 ms·
if it's good and it works well, then the human using the LLM did a good job, and need not credit their LLM of choice as one would not credit their rubber duck.
by desro 2y ago
if it's good and it works well, then the human using the LLM did a good job, and need not credit their LLM of choice as one would not credit their rubber duck.
- OuterVale 2y agoThis thought process begs the question, why not just review code and deny what's bad, rather than blanket ban any code with LLM involvement? That way you retain the productivity benefits of LLMs, and can still deny flawed code.
- edflsafoiewq 2y agoTheir issue is copyright, not code correctness/quality.
- famouswaffles 2y agoYou have a rubber duck that writes code?
- ssd532 2y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_duck_debugging https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_duck_debugging