5 ms·

Hold on. She's not locked out. She couldn't share it with someone else . Completely different.

• jan_Sate 2y ago
  Yeah. The title is a click bait. It looks like that most people didn't read past the title. Anyway Google could actually lock her out if it wants to. That's why using cloud storage is a bad idea. If you're using it, at least make sure that you've got a local copy so that things like this won't happen.
• bewaretheirs 2y ago
  "Publisher given unsolicited sexually explicit manuscript, declines to publish it".
  • brokenmachine 2y ago
    Google is a publisher? So I can sue them if, for example, I read about how to do something dangerous and hurt myself? Or libel? Interesting.
    • bewaretheirs 2y ago
      Google does a lot of things in a lot of different contexts. It's not always acting as a publisher but here I think it is, and it has claimed to be one in the past. In 2012, Eugene Volokh argued on behalf of Google that it was indeed a publisher: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/21/business/media/eugene-volokh-ucla-professor-makes-a-case-for-google-as-publisher.html https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/21/business/media/eugene-vol...
• yieldcrv 2y ago
  Both happened, according to the article
  • Thorrez 2y ago
    Where does the article say she can no longer view her own file? Disclosure: I work at Google, but not on anything related to this.
    • yieldcrv 2y ago
      You’re right, I misread the following lines