7 ms·
Could you clarify which result you're referring to as the baseline and "number 1 place?" I should clarify that our published Clickbench results are from our pg
by retakeming 2y ago
Could you clarify which result you're referring to as the baseline and "number 1 place?"
I should clarify that our published Clickbench results are from our pg_analytics extension. New results with pg_lakehouse will be released. They're going to beat the old benchmarks because 1. No overhead from Postgres transactions/MVCC, since pg_analytics used the table access method whereas pg_lakehouse is just a foreign data wrapper 2. Uses the latest release of DataFusion.
The performance differences that exist between DataFusion and other OLAP engine are rapidly becoming commoditized. DataFusion is already a world-class query engine and will only improve. pg_lakehouse absorbs all those improvements into Postgres.
- riku_iki 2y agoWould be great to also see new pg_lakehouse and datafusion benchmark results here: https://duckdblabs.github.io/db-benchmark/ https://duckdblabs.github.io/db-benchmark/ Currently Datafusion is much slower than duckdb or OOMing.