6 ms·
We use it for our nfs servers. Very secure, but the file cache is still nerfed.
by matrix12 2y ago
We use it for our nfs servers.
Very secure, but the file cache is still nerfed.
- znpy 2y ago> We use it for our nfs servers. Very secure, but the file cache is still nerfed. Why not FreeBSD or Linux for that use case? Chances are you'd get better "file cache" (and hence better latency/throughput)
- matrix12 2y agoSecurity was the only concern.
- pram 2y agoThe only thing OpenBSD protects you from is performance.
- _mlbt 2y agoTheir record speaks for itself. “Only two remote holes in the default install, in a heck of a long time!”
- udev4096 2y agohttps://isopenbsdsecu.re https://isopenbsdsecu.re
- anthk 2y agoThat is getting more and more outdated with each release.
- ansible 2y agoSo of course I have to ask... What version of NFS are you running, and are you disallowing the older versions? How are you handling user accounts? LDAP, Samba PDC (which is also LDAP), something else?
- DEADMINCE 2y agoThen Devuan or Fedora with SELinux would have given better security and performance.