6 ms·
I think that's what they are trying to achieve with Mojo.
by farresito 2y ago
I think that's what they are trying to achieve with Mojo.
- sa-code 2y agoAgreed, although the language still feels like a tech demo. They don't even have a package manager yet. I'm curious and hopeful to see what it looks like in a year
- mirekrusin 2y agoThey don't yet have `class` support.
- sa-code 2y agoThey have their own version called struct which works in a very similar way. I feel like this should be mentioned when saying that `class` support didn't yet exist
- mirekrusin 2y agoYes, you're right and struct is _the_ interesting part about mojo and is enough to write interesting things in it. Floodgates will open though once class is also supported.
- almostgotcaught 2y ago[flagged]
- fuzztester 2y agoPosted this Chris Lattner interview about Mojo to HN yesterday. The video is just 6 days old. It's on the Developer Voices channel. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40285414 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40285414