8 ms·
> SV was very lax with this in the past. They just adjusted to how it is normally handled in corporate. What's remarkable is that SV allowed protests against U
by linearrust 2y ago
> SV was very lax with this in the past. They just adjusted to how it is normally handled in corporate.
What's remarkable is that SV allowed protests against US, china, russia, anyone really. But protest against israeli war crimes is where they drew the line.
SV, media, congress, everyone supported violent protests that burned down cities. But peaceful protests in college campuses against israeli genocide is where they send in the storm troopers.
In china, they send in the storm troopers if you protest communist rule. It's interesting what we send the storm troopers for. Food for thought.
- shmatt 2y agoThey and We are doing some extra leg work here They were fired for blocking a senior executives private office. Do that in the name of US, china, russia, sesame street, and you're getting fired.
- linearrust 2y ago> They were fired for blocking a senior executives private office. That must be it. That must be why the media, congress, colleges, etc are all cracking down on protests. Where were they a few years ago when 'peaceful protests' were 'peacefully' burning down cities? It says something when both MSNBC and Fox News agree on cracking down on protests.