> It sounds like you do agree with affuture.org though. From the post. > We need your help to stop this now. I do not want to stop this bill; I want it revise

> It sounds like you do agree with affuture.org though. From the post. > We need your help to stop this now. I do not want to stop this bill; I want it revised. If that is not understood, then I suspect my primary goal for safer, less biased models is at odds with your primary goal of unregulated innovation. At least if we continue to discuss this as a binary where agreeing with this affuture.org post means killing this legislation (as the post asks for) and not replacing it.